There is only one problem with this model of change: it doesn't work. >>

1. It forces a response to particular change, rather than coexistence within a change culture.

2. It renders people dependent on the source of the intervention and weakens their ability to be self-generating.

3. It places the emphasis on a person's "will power" and "intention," which tends to be an unreliable source for change.

The change-by-improving-behavior model acts as a push system. It demands rather than invites. It forces people into a state of internal conflict, leading them to feel that there is something about themselves which they need to change.

But if we look at the source of motivation -- at the source of high performance -- it may be that something entirely different is going on. Something that cannot be accounted for by the traditional dualistic view of things and the change-by-improvement model which it underlies.

Continue >>

 



GAME #3

Think of a recent time when you were trying to get someone else to change what they were doing or how they were doing it. This could be your significant other, your parent, your child, a colleague or friend, or someone you manage.

How did it go? Were you pushing them? Were you inviting them?

If you were pushing, what signals did the other convey to tell you that you were pushing?

If you were inviting, were you holding back? Or were you being genuine?

Ecosystemae
217.384.2507
michael@ecosystemae.com